Lucid Dreams
Monday, October 06, 2014
Haider and Kashmir
Friday, July 19, 2013
Reflections on Partition
Tuesday, June 25, 2013
A New Beginning
Saturday, December 29, 2012
Letters
Friday, November 02, 2012
2 Weeks in South Bombay
Wednesday, April 04, 2012
Jaipur Literary Festival: Day 1
I’d left for Jaipur the night before the fest was scheduled to start. A night spent in a bus gives one a lot of time to think, and not much sleep. Ever since I knew I was going to Jaipur, I’d been willing myself through the exams with the promise of what was to come after. I anticipated seeing and meeting interesting people, see authors talk about their books and hear a dialogue on literature I hadn’t heard before. But oddly enough, the night before I reached I was worried that it would be an anti-climax. I fell asleep to that thought. The next day though I was excited. I reached Jaipur around 6:15 am and didn’t sleep at all after that and reached the Diggi Palace, the venue of the festival at 9:40, twenty minutes early. When I saw the huge crowds walking in along with me, I felt upbeat, and couldn’t stop smiling. There were a lot of pretty girls around, a consequence of anyone with any kind of literary pretensions from Delhi descending to Jaipur.
I walked in to strains of the Kirtan Gurbani sung by singers from the Golden Temple. The festival begun to a few speeches by various people, one of them to my delight being William Darlymple. The tension of Rushdie’s pulling out hung in the air. Most alluded to it in some way. The lamp was lit, and slowly, crowds started pouring in, a significant portion were foreigners. A lot of confused schoolchildren of varying ages were also around. The keynote address was delivered by Purushottam Aggarwal and Arvind Krishna Mehrotra on Bhakti Poetry: The living legacy. Purushottam Aggarwal spoke mostly in Hindi and explained the legacy of Bhakti poetry as being different from that of submission and devotion and more akin to love arising out of relative equality. In Bhakti poetry, the Bhakta(Devotee) would show his Bhakti by treating his god like a lover, or a little naughty child( both alluding to Krishna). What was more interesting was what Mr Aggarwal said next. After showing the scope for dialogue and reason between the God and the Bhakta, he explained how the Bhakti poets were reactionaries of their times, who fought for the right to say what they want. He beautifully linked the spirit of Bhakti poetry to the spirit of Bhakti poetry to the spirit of free expression, and though he never explicitly said it, the allusion was clear (Hint: Salman Rushdie). Mr. Mehrotra then launched straightaway into some translations of Tamil Bhakti poets, like Tukaram. After some verses( translated in a very minimalist way), he regaled everyone with verses with the perspective of Tukaram’s wife and son, who curse Tukaram (and God) for his devotion to a God who does not give them the basic necessities of life, since he has turned Tukaram into his devotee. He next went into Kabir’s verses and translated many of them, focusing on verses which show his contempt for religion After some verses where Kabir made fun of Hinduism, there were more which made fun of Muslims and Islam. Mehrotra then wryly remarked that Kabir and Richard Dawkins would find a lot of common ground if they met each other!
Moares had arrived in the interim. I loved the beginning, and knew this was my kind of place to be. I looked around at the kind of sessions I could be at, and had the choice of a biographer of Tolstoy, a discussion of the Sikh gurus, and the award winning author of the English Patient, Michael Ondaatje. I chose Ondaatje even though I’d read the English Patient many years ago and had not read the book he was going to speak about. The person who was interviewing him, Amitava Kumar had also had also written a book I was really fond of, called Husband of a Fanatic. It was an interesting session, very focused on Ondaatje’s writing process, his aims when he writes, what he explores when he writes etc. He explained how he came to write his latest book. He saw a vision, of a boy boarding a ship, a journey he had himself made many years ago as an 11 year old boy going from Sri Lanka to England. He did not remember the journey, so he set out to write a fictional book about it. He said many things very specific to the books but there are certain things I remember and appreciated. He tends to look at multiple perspectives of different characters and bring the characters at the margins into the mainstream. His historical novels tend to look at the events whose stories were never told, those at the interstices of history. Amitava also went into a thread of the process of lost innocence which recurs in his works. I was also very interested in his writing process, a process I found very similar in another writer I admire, especially the way he begins. He sees an image and wants to write about that image. Then, as he himself said, he creates collages( a form of art he is interested in) and connects the dots together until they form a story. Also, he has no idea about what the books are going to be about until he writes them. Ondaatje spoke really well and I learnt and understood things I would never have heard of otherwise.
There were a lot of random rich people, bored students bored by what this festival was really about, people talking about books, and writing them. But so many people were interested, you could see it in their faces. I had some interesting choices in my next session, but I went for the big name one, David Remnick, the editor of the New Yorker and biographer of Barack Obama, on supposedly the ‘Dissapointment of Obama’. Remnick sounded far from disappointed with Obama however. The session was very crowded and I was standing in the aisle. I had been looking forward to meeting Amitava Kumar earlier and asking him about his book but had lost him earlier and was thus late and had to stand. A man poked me from behind and asked me to move and I found it was Amitava Kumar himself. I promptly told him I loved a book of his. Then I spazzed out and temporarily rendered speechless didn’t remember the name of the book. He actually kept naming books he’d written till I remembered. Feeling exceedingly lame, I trooped off only to find a seat next to him again. Mortified though I was, I tried to talk to him but he seemed interested in something else and I let it go.
Coming back to Remnick, he described the phenomenon of Obama and how improbable it was. Though he stressed that race, that is being African American was a big part of Obama’s success, that was very specific to his own persona. He also explained that the fact of his race applied because of his specific persona, his diverse background and that advantage would not apply in case of most other African Americans. He rose from the position of state senator, a very insignificant position in American politics to the President because of his charisma, his persona and his circumstances. On Obama’s disappointment he explained that the main reason is the polarisation of American politics and how the Republicans wouldn’t let him do anything. He bashed the American Right of course and since I’d been watching the Daily Show for a while it was fun to see the liberal newsmedia in action. Man had charisma too, I had been very interested in American politics for a while, but he kept everyone enthralled, breaking everything down.
After some Papri Chat and Pushkar Chai in hot clay cups, I hung around at a session chaired by Barkha Dutt called Arab Spring: A Writer’s View which contained some writers from the Muslim world that is an Iranian woman, an Egyptian woman, a Palestinian man, an ‘expert’ American’ journalist and an Indian diplomat(presumably another expert)! First thing I noticed was Barkha Dutt is actually really good at her job, I had seen and saw subsequently badly moderated sessions but this one went off flawlessly. All the writers spoke about their experiences of the Arab Spring and their hopes for the future. Things looked bleak for the future in many of those countries and the conclusion seemed to be that the transition from dictatorship and democracy would not be seamless, it could be long and bloody, or it could certainly be delayed. Barkha Dutt kept pressing the women, saying that things are really getting worse for women after the regimes, be it Egypt or Libya, but the women only said that the situation was intolerable and though they don’t like the possible erosion of their rights, the old regime had to be changed. In the middle of this, I figured that there was a session with Pavan K Varma( a non-fiction writer I admire) and Gulzar and left for there. The next twenty minutes I was enthralled and watched both of them recite couplets in Urdu and English. Gulzar’s language is not very hard to understand( Urdu can get very grandiose and complicated) and even my limited Urdu vocabulary sufficed. Then they read out verses which Varma had written and Gulzar had translated. So, beautiful verses in English followed by even better verses in Urdu. Nice vivid imagery. Gulzar never changed the literal meaning but added something in translation that added a rhythm to them.
I stayed put after that because the man I’d come to see, Mohammed Hanif was next. He wrote one of my favourite books, The Case of Exploding Mangoes which was a thriller, satire set in Zia’s Pakistan which culminates with Zia’s assassination. I highly recommend that you read it. Anyway, Mohammed Hanif is brilliant, and very funny in real life. His self deprecating humour kept everyone in splits. His satire on Pakistani society and politics is laugh-out-loud and bitingly satirical at the same time. He writes in Punjabi, Urdu and English but writes his novels in English. He described how in Pakistan, he grew up with Punjabi as his mother tongue, but the funny thing about the education system in Pakistan is that he had to learn Urdu in school and not speak Punjabi and then later in life had to speak English and not Urdu. This multi lingual confusion certainly made him very good at all those languages( as l saw later also). I was happy now, a literary hero of mine more than measured up to my expectation, he was even funnier in real life than in his books! After asking a very stupid question, which I immediately regretted, I left, kind of content.
What I saw next did not leave me feeling as good. Brilliantly moderated by Siddarth Vardarajan( He’s now editor of the Hindu) was a session on Prison Diaries. Three people, Iftikhar Gilani, Anjum Zamarud Habib and Sahil Maqbool had been arrested for crimes they did not commit just because they were Kashmiri. Iftikhar Gilani we all know, was arrested after the Parliament attacks. Prosecuted under the Official Secrets Act for a document that was publicly available, he spent many months in jail. All three described their experiences in prison that they’d written about and one wondered at the callousness of the Indian state which imprisoned them and so many other people. As Sahil pointed out, you know about us since we wrote our diaries but you don’t know any of the nameless, faceless people who have no one to speak for them. Iftikhar also made a plea to journalists. While he was in jail, he was regularly beaten up by jailors who read about his supposed ‘proved’ treachery in newspapers every day. These accounts had no sources and no truth to them. He pointed out that the common man takes what is written in a newspaper or on TV as the gospel truth, you have that power over people, please don’t misuse and abuse it.
Now, after a marathon first day, the last session. Jeet Thayil, well known poet had just released a book called Narcopolis which was about Bombay and drugs in the 70s and 80s. Ruchir Joshi, a journalist from Calcutta wrote a book called Poribartan about Mamata Bannerjee in Bengal. What followed was a surreal reading experience. The contrast between Jeet’s vivid, poetic, dark passages and Ruchir’s wry, anecdotal, funny accounts of the transition in Bengal was entertaining. They read one passage, each and I was drawn into the contrast. Then they read together, a certain passage and I’m pretty sure I was one of the first people in the room to figure out the passage’s content( having read the book in question). They were the offending passages in the Satanic Verses, read out with gay abandon. As soon as people started figuring out what it was, the clapping started. And it ended with a standing ovation. I later found out that Hari Kunzru and Amitav Kumar had done the same thing in the last session but they were stopped.
This laboriously written description cannot give you the sense of the place. A lot of people did not like the tamasha nature of the festival, the amount of people, the crowd from Delhi( especially Delhi University people, most of whom came to party) and many of them were regulars, nostalgic about its beginnings. However, for me, the people I met, the huge crowds that I navigated through, the Kachoris and Pushkar Chai, the conversations I overheard, the conversations that others overheard and joined, the stunning bookshop, the beautiful location, everything was part of what has been called the ‘greatest literary show on earth’. Sure, Rushdie didn’t come( and I very much wanted to see him) but so many other people did and I saw many of them speak. That’s what it was about, interesting people talking about literature and politics, often very subaltern rather than mainstream.( For example, many sessions on Bhakti poetry, poetry Hindi, Bengali, Punjabi, Tamil , writing in Latin America, China, the Carribean, Africa). It is a place to discuss things which we don’t have a discourse about. Just go see the mind-boggling variety of sessions on offer in 2012. I’ll suggest if you ever have a chance, go. You’ll find something you like.
Wednesday, November 30, 2011
Strawberry Fields: A tribute
Monday, October 24, 2011
A Day in Class
I sit and stare, at a clock, while people around me,
make no sense when they talk.
The master of proceedings, the professor, leads a discussion superfluous,
time slows down, no one makes a fuss.
Some go on and on, loving the sound of their own voice,
if they only knew, half the class would shoot them if they had a choice.
Paying attention, the blessed note-takers,
sleeping in the back, the usual rule-breakers.
Someone’s doing the crossword, one is catching up on his reading,
others are staring at their watches, and silently pleading.
The bored student, staring at a pretty face,
gets caught in the act, hastily lowers his gaze.
Amidst the drudgery, something mildly amusing is heard,
there is desk banging in unison, though most didn’t even catch a word.
Someone is interrupted, from his daydreams and thoughts,
asked to answer a question, he doesn’t know squat.
People texting each other, and notes being passed,
messages delivered, in the way of the present, and the way of the past.
The process of attendance, was pretty much a farce,
for most of those marked present, are not in the class.
One of the blessed souls, who made the effort of staying behind,
was caught using his phone and very heavily fined.
‘No more’, he swore, ‘Hey Teacher, have some mercy’,
I made the effort of coming to class, please show me some courtesy.
His plea unheard, his voice marked with resonance,
he resolved in future, to deny the class his presence.
Another subplot, the students sitting so close,
giggling to each other while people behind them doze.
A person moves to the next seat, there begins a fight,
for a student sleeping comfortably, is now in the teacher’s line of sight.
Sit in front of me please, a cacophony of voices breaks out,
the teacher, interrupted from his reverie, wonders what this is all about.
The classroom is a place to chill, a place to unwind,
but we grow dull and despondent, if we’re there for too much time.
I yearn to be liberated, I yearn to be free,
I yearn to escape from this room so dreary.
A sigh of relief, someone’s rung the bell,
it’s time to escape, from the classroom from hell.
Friday, October 21, 2011
Pakistan, Dussehra and Ganganagar
One of the many examples of horrendous spelling in Ganganagar
One fascinating thing in the city is the many billboards and road signs which are paragons of bad spelling. I also saw the burning of the effigies of Ravan, Kumbhkaran and Meghnad on Dussehra for the first time in my life. Out of interest I convinced my parents to take me there and it was a colourful and entertaining spectacle. People dressed up in costume actually shoot a burning arrow at the effigies which being full of firecrackers burn up, explode and fall in spectacular fashion.
Effigies to be burnt during Dussehra
The highlight of my visit though was going to see the Pakistan border at Fazilka. Like at the Wagah border in Amritsar there is a post there and both sides hold a ceremony called Beating the Retreat which concludes with the border guards pulling down their respective flags in synchronized fashion. It took us around an hour and a half to get there in our army gypsy and I was following our route on GPS and gleefully watched us inch closer and closer to Pakistan. Around 500 m before the actual post there is some very dense fencing which my dad told me is in many cases electrified. No regular vehicles are allowed beyond that point. We got off and had tea with the BSF officer in charge there. We got onto a BSF gypsy and arrived at the post. There were around 50 people on our side along with the BSF jawans and there were many more on the Pakistani side which according to the BSF officer was because it was a Friday. There were loud patriotic songs coming from the Pakistani side, so much that it overpowered the loudspeaker on our side, which at one point for some reason was playing, “Kajra Re”! The Pakistani Rangers in their salwars and the people must have been 200 odd metres away so we could see them pretty well.
Jawans from the BSF during the ceremony
The ceremony soon started with guards from both sides screaming louder and louder, marching in perfect synchronization, getting their legs higher and higher and making weird provocative gestures at each other like some oddly choreographed military dance. Things were quiet at first but soon there was clapping from the Pakistani side with shouts of ‘Pakistan Zindabad’, ‘Jiye Jiye Pakistan’ and the occasional ‘Allah-u-Akbar’. The Indians were quiet for a while but then a lady in our crowd started chants of ‘ Hindustan Zindabad’ and ‘Bharat Mata Ki Jai’. The Indian side was hopelessly outnumbered though enthusiastic.
I and my parents though shouting along with the others were finding it really funny and all the chanting was more in fun than in any hostility towards the other side. Both officers on both sides stood up and saluted the parade of marching men. The whole thing went on for some 20 minutes and soon the bugle was being played and the flags went down synchronized to the inch. I thought the show was over, but there was one last subplot. The people from both sides were then allowed to come up to the thin barbed wire which marked the border with huge men on both sides standing in front of them to make sure nothing untoward occurs. Then it was odd, people were staring at each other like they were looking at aliens from another world, most would never meet anyone from the other country. I think one Pakistani started the waving, and soon there was waving and good natured staring very unlike the patriotic brouhaha that went on a few minutes ago. Though separated by a few miles, the appearance of the locals on both sides showed a marked contrast. Women were in a separate group there, wearing burkhas or covering their heads in lightly coloured chadars. And most of the men there were wearing salwars.
Pakistanis staring at us, and we at them
On the Indian side, most men were in jeans, the women were brightly dressed up and there was no obvious segregation. It was very obvious that this was relatively impoverished rural Punjab from the way ordinary Pakistanis looked to us while Fazilka is a prosperous district in a very prosperous state and it showed.
I had a lot of fun but I felt oddly philosophical after the whole experience. I’m known for my fascination with Pakistan and its culture and one day want to go there. As a child growing up in the Army my views were fairly atypical. We visited a beautiful war memorial from the ’71 war which was on the way. There you see the names of the dead, army men like my dad, who fought and died. The regular person’s anger is then directed at the enemy. For me, however the notion of a country, a stereotype of a people as an enemy is absurd and can only come when it has been drilled into you that a country is an enemy. Wars are huge impersonal things and Pakistan cannot be our enemy forever. One day we’ll be able to walk across the Wagah border with ease like this guy did. Till then, I can at least break stereotypes and blogs like this and this give me hope. The flow of information that has been facilitated by the Internet has given me a solution to a problem which I pondered as a child, how does a Pakistani child, the same age as mine believe the things he does, when it so obvious that we are right about everything. The answer is, no we aren’t right about everything, there is no black or white, there is always another side to what we believe. And once we all understand that, we won’t hate the ‘other’ as much.
Part of the war memorial where soldiers' ashes are kept
Finally, after all I had seen, the enduring image from the whole exercise was a bird, which kept hopping from one side of the border to another, back and forth almost as if to show the meaninglessness of the border for it.
Wednesday, September 14, 2011
Being Punjabi
A certain blog post gone viral , an open letter to a Delhi Boy, specifically a very Punjabi Delhi Boy had me thinking. I’m not from Delhi, never even lived there, but whenever I’ve stayed there for any length of time, the place feels excessively familiar. It’s the Naarth, and most people speak in a very familiar accent. There is a certain Punjabiness about the place, from the food(which is awesome) to the way people behave in traffic to the way people spend money, and also unfortunately the way people stare at women. This viral post (has a 1000+ comments right now) generalizes to a fault and has attracted vitriol from many defenders of the faith and rational commentators who point out that she well spews hatred and makes too much fun of Punjabis. The open letter is funny in places, and I agree with her about certain things, but gets a little nasty sometimes (the Gurpurab and partition references).
Reminded me however, that I am Punjabi. Specifically a Punjabi Brahmin. Almost seems like a contradiction, ‘cause Punjabis are supposed to be overtly masculine and Brahmins are well...not. Also, reminds me of the time I read in an old sociological study while researching for my project that Punjab is one of the few places that the Brahmin is not dominant, in fact rarely owns land and most are priests or petty shopkeepers. At least my ancestors were in no position to oppress anyone unlike some others( Hint: Tambrahms :) ). There are however, certain Punjabi stereotypes that don’t come off too well on me. As a friend pointed out, “You can’t be Punjabi.” “Why?” “ You well, READ!” I can be loud, I put lots of white butter on my pronthas, I relish rajma-chawal( and BUTTER CHICKEN) , am prone to breaking into bhangra in quad parties when a Punjabi song comes on, I can atleast understand the language, but I have committed the cardinal crime of being “intellactual”( said in a strong Punjabi accent). I was the toast of all my buas and masis and chachis for being the only child to be found reading in a corner when all others were busy playing something or the other. I can’t drink great quantities of alcohol without being affected, can’t play sports to save my life, and try not to lech at girls on the street. When I meet ‘REAL’ Punjabi cousins I don’t like it when they drive their cars having downed pegs of whiskey playing very loud music and driving very fast. (especially when those cousins are fifteen years old). I don’t think it is my right to control my sister’s and every other female cousin’s life because I am their big brother.
On the other hand, I love Punjabi weddings , with their sheer ostentatiousness and spirit of celebration with the whole extended family, and the bloody incredible food( and hopefully for me in the future, alcohol). I am obsessed with Pakistan, actually just Lahore, because my grandparents came across the border. I love it when they talk in Urdu sounding Hindi, or when my relatives from Gurdaspur( who never came from across the border) call a Minister a ‘wazir’ rather than a ‘mantri’. For that is my heritage, to all those who call Punjab’s culture agriculture, I would like to point out the stunning Punjabi poetry ( Bulleh Shah, Shiv Kumar Batalvi) which has come to me via Rabbi, and my mom, who explains them to me. Having learnt Hindustani classical music I appreciate things like the Patiala Gharana and the stunning Sufi Punjabi heritage which also comes to me via Pakistan. No way can I disregard Bhangra, which is awesome to dance to, and which has had awesome things done to it in ‘Caneda’ and ‘UK’ by overseas Punjabis. For after all, culture is not the exclusive preserve of the Bengalis. And only in Punjab do you have things like Gurudwaras which give away free meals as langar. I also remember the time in a train when Hindu pilgrims from Ludhiana going to Haridwar shared food with the entire bogie. And the language in the state is awesome, unlike Delhi where they just speak Hindi with a Punjabi accent.
I am Punjabi, and I’m not Sikh (though I have a few Sikh relatives). Why do I emphasize that? It’s pretty cool to be Sikh but I just am not, and I’m still Punjabi. We don’t wear Pugries and along with gurudwaras(everyone goes to Gurudwaras, the Golden temple is just incredible) go to temples too. We speak Punjabi, comprise 45% of the state’s population and exercise a pretty pervasive cultural influence(check Bollywood) but I still get the ‘how’re you Punjabi but not Sikh routine’.
Punjab to me was always Chandigarh. On moving to law school I saw the rest of it for the first time, and though there are certain things about it that I can’t stand, it is a pretty incredible place. Unlike the rest of the country, most people are not poor, people have a lot of money and love to spend it, and there’s a certain altitude to life which is fun. I may personally don’t feel that way because I’m too ‘intellactual’ for them and thus will always not be exactly like them. But there is a certain part of me that is, and I think that’s pretty great.